• Our Words Matter

Why do we tolerate bullying?

“Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me”.


An old saying that I’m sure many of us still use to help our kids through school yard name calling. But let’s face it, this name calling is just bullying dressed up as ‘kids being kids’. So why are we tolerating it?


In a recent opinion article (click here to read), Race Relations Commissioner Meng Foon talks about New Zealand building up an unnatural tolerance for bullying, our increased acceptance of bullying as a reality of our society and questions why we are not prepared to do more about stopping it and protecting our kids from corrosive bullying.


He’s right and it starts at us not intervening early enough. Not paying enough attention to the name calling, the stealing of sandwiches, the silly “you’re not allowed to sit with us” banter that goes on every day in our schools.


As parents, we do our best to teach our kids, who are often the victims of this bullying, to be resilient but what’s being done to teach the kids who are dishing it out that it’s not OK and at what point do we stop them from progressing to the next stage?


No one benefits from bullying, it hurts everyone – the victims, the witnesses, families, friends, and I’d even say the bullies themselves must get hurt at some point. The harmful effects of bulling reach deeper than many of us realise and by tolerating it we are granting permission to those who bully, to keep it up.


But what will take for our country to wake up, put a line in the sand and actively work together to eliminate bullying from all corners of our society?


We need to make our schools safe, our workplaces safe, our homes and communities safe and the only way we can do that is to take a very hard line on bullying which means just what Meng Foon suggests - that the Government mandates bullying prevention.




Meng Foon: Protect kids from corrosive effects of bullying

Published in NZ Herald :

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12280315

The ambulance at the bottom of the cliff analogy is an often-overused cliche. It is used when criticising government for ignoring and underinvesting in prevention measures.


But in the case of school bullying, the shoe fits. If government and schools took bullying prevention seriously, it would be impossible to estimate the positive flow-on effects. Children would be spared from physical harm and emotional trauma and we would futureproof our country from countless, related social issues.


Framed positively, schools would become safe places where young people are supported to become decent and fair adults. As the Race Relations Commissioner, I am adding my voice to the Children's Commissioner — I am calling for the Government to mandate bullying prevention. I also want it to be compulsory for schools to collect bullying data.


New Zealand has built up an unnatural tolerance for bullying. We rank very poorly in international bullying statistics. Initiatives over the past five years have not improved these figures. Ninety-four per cent of teachers indicate that bullying occurs in their school. Uptake by individual schools to implement anti-bullying initiatives is voluntary and no standardised measures exist.


The Government, school leaders and by virtue, New Zealanders, have accepted bullying as a reality. Bullying is not a rite of passage or a marker of youth resilience.


Tolerating school bullying is tantamount to accommodating it. If we don't put a spike in the pathway of bullying behaviour now, it will be the norm in our adult life.


For example, workplace harassment and bullying is now firmly cemented in the New Zealand employment lexicon. No workplace, including the one I now represent, is immune from bullying and harassment complaints. Media, advocates and government inquiries can give complainants a hearing.

But, why should we have to accommodate the prolonged negative effects of bullying behaviour? So how do we stop bullying?

This is a topic where ideas are abundant. However, not all ideas are evidence-based. Even seemingly straightforward solutions can sometimes have unintended consequences. One solution that has been suggested is having cameras in schools or personal security devices to record, and to deter physical bullying. On the plus side this approach has kept lots of people safer such as public transport commuters and people dealing with authorities. This is predicated on the idea that we behave better when people are watching. From a human rights lens, balancing the right to safety with the right to privacy is required. For instance, if video footage of bullying went viral, it would haunt victims for years, or inspire copycat or revenge videos. In the end, attempts to curb physical bullying could ironically lead to more online bullying.

Moreover, what message does it send our children? If schools are only safe with surveillance, then we're ignoring the bigger issues.

So, enough hypothesising. The Human Rights Commission suggests that our best chance to eliminate bullying will require government and all schools to commit to two key actions.


The first action is mandatory, evidence-based bullying prevention programmes in schools. For years, the commission along with the Ombudsman, various United Nations committees, the Law Commission and the Office of the Children's Commissioner have all called for these prevention programmes in schools. To date, the Government has not acted on this advice.


An example of programme that should be mandated and funded is Kiva. A primary evaluation showed excellent results in 30 New Zealand schools. Bullying decreased between students and even between teachers.


Secondly, Government must make it mandatory for schools to collect bullying statistics and monitor students' experiences of bullying. This not a question of whether bullying occurs, this is the data on frequency and causes. The gathering of family violence data was a game changer in recognising the prevalence of the issue and designing suitable prevention. Without bullying data, we will not have an accurate picture of its extent, and it will be impossible to assess whether initiatives are effective.


But continuing to deprioritise prevention is another sign that we have normalised bullying in the same way we have learnt to tolerate high rates of abuse, family violence and suicide. Addressing bullying could help restrain these violent forces.


Let's futureproof our children from the corrosive effects of bullying now.



92 views

SUBSCRIBE

 Even when words don't seem enough, they matter. They help us create connections, make meaningful contributions and overcome some of the deep-seated issues facing our country.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter.  

CONTACT US